Package akka.protobuf

Interface DescriptorProtos.FieldOptionsOrBuilder

    • Method Detail

      • hasCtype

        boolean hasCtype()
        optional .google.protobuf.FieldOptions.CType ctype = 1 [default = STRING];
         The ctype option instructs the C++ code generator to use a different
         representation of the field than it normally would.  See the specific
         options below.  This option is not yet implemented in the open source
         release -- sorry, we'll try to include it in a future version!
         
      • getCtype

        DescriptorProtos.FieldOptions.CType getCtype()
        optional .google.protobuf.FieldOptions.CType ctype = 1 [default = STRING];
         The ctype option instructs the C++ code generator to use a different
         representation of the field than it normally would.  See the specific
         options below.  This option is not yet implemented in the open source
         release -- sorry, we'll try to include it in a future version!
         
      • hasPacked

        boolean hasPacked()
        optional bool packed = 2;
         The packed option can be enabled for repeated primitive fields to enable
         a more efficient representation on the wire. Rather than repeatedly
         writing the tag and type for each element, the entire array is encoded as
         a single length-delimited blob.
         
      • getPacked

        boolean getPacked()
        optional bool packed = 2;
         The packed option can be enabled for repeated primitive fields to enable
         a more efficient representation on the wire. Rather than repeatedly
         writing the tag and type for each element, the entire array is encoded as
         a single length-delimited blob.
         
      • hasLazy

        boolean hasLazy()
        optional bool lazy = 5 [default = false];
         Should this field be parsed lazily?  Lazy applies only to message-type
         fields.  It means that when the outer message is initially parsed, the
         inner message's contents will not be parsed but instead stored in encoded
         form.  The inner message will actually be parsed when it is first accessed.
        
         This is only a hint.  Implementations are free to choose whether to use
         eager or lazy parsing regardless of the value of this option.  However,
         setting this option true suggests that the protocol author believes that
         using lazy parsing on this field is worth the additional bookkeeping
         overhead typically needed to implement it.
        
         This option does not affect the public interface of any generated code;
         all method signatures remain the same.  Furthermore, thread-safety of the
         interface is not affected by this option; const methods remain safe to
         call from multiple threads concurrently, while non-const methods continue
         to require exclusive access.
        
        
         Note that implementations may choose not to check required fields within
         a lazy sub-message.  That is, calling IsInitialized() on the outher message
         may return true even if the inner message has missing required fields.
         This is necessary because otherwise the inner message would have to be
         parsed in order to perform the check, defeating the purpose of lazy
         parsing.  An implementation which chooses not to check required fields
         must be consistent about it.  That is, for any particular sub-message, the
         implementation must either *always* check its required fields, or *never*
         check its required fields, regardless of whether or not the message has
         been parsed.
         
      • getLazy

        boolean getLazy()
        optional bool lazy = 5 [default = false];
         Should this field be parsed lazily?  Lazy applies only to message-type
         fields.  It means that when the outer message is initially parsed, the
         inner message's contents will not be parsed but instead stored in encoded
         form.  The inner message will actually be parsed when it is first accessed.
        
         This is only a hint.  Implementations are free to choose whether to use
         eager or lazy parsing regardless of the value of this option.  However,
         setting this option true suggests that the protocol author believes that
         using lazy parsing on this field is worth the additional bookkeeping
         overhead typically needed to implement it.
        
         This option does not affect the public interface of any generated code;
         all method signatures remain the same.  Furthermore, thread-safety of the
         interface is not affected by this option; const methods remain safe to
         call from multiple threads concurrently, while non-const methods continue
         to require exclusive access.
        
        
         Note that implementations may choose not to check required fields within
         a lazy sub-message.  That is, calling IsInitialized() on the outher message
         may return true even if the inner message has missing required fields.
         This is necessary because otherwise the inner message would have to be
         parsed in order to perform the check, defeating the purpose of lazy
         parsing.  An implementation which chooses not to check required fields
         must be consistent about it.  That is, for any particular sub-message, the
         implementation must either *always* check its required fields, or *never*
         check its required fields, regardless of whether or not the message has
         been parsed.
         
      • hasDeprecated

        boolean hasDeprecated()
        optional bool deprecated = 3 [default = false];
         Is this field deprecated?
         Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations
         for accessors, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this
         is a formalization for deprecating fields.
         
      • getDeprecated

        boolean getDeprecated()
        optional bool deprecated = 3 [default = false];
         Is this field deprecated?
         Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations
         for accessors, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this
         is a formalization for deprecating fields.
         
      • hasExperimentalMapKey

        boolean hasExperimentalMapKey()
        optional string experimental_map_key = 9;
         EXPERIMENTAL.  DO NOT USE.
         For "map" fields, the name of the field in the enclosed type that
         is the key for this map.  For example, suppose we have:
           message Item {
             required string name = 1;
             required string value = 2;
           }
           message Config {
             repeated Item items = 1 [experimental_map_key="name"];
           }
         In this situation, the map key for Item will be set to "name".
         TODO: Fully-implement this, then remove the "experimental_" prefix.
         
      • getExperimentalMapKey

        java.lang.String getExperimentalMapKey()
        optional string experimental_map_key = 9;
         EXPERIMENTAL.  DO NOT USE.
         For "map" fields, the name of the field in the enclosed type that
         is the key for this map.  For example, suppose we have:
           message Item {
             required string name = 1;
             required string value = 2;
           }
           message Config {
             repeated Item items = 1 [experimental_map_key="name"];
           }
         In this situation, the map key for Item will be set to "name".
         TODO: Fully-implement this, then remove the "experimental_" prefix.
         
      • getExperimentalMapKeyBytes

        ByteString getExperimentalMapKeyBytes()
        optional string experimental_map_key = 9;
         EXPERIMENTAL.  DO NOT USE.
         For "map" fields, the name of the field in the enclosed type that
         is the key for this map.  For example, suppose we have:
           message Item {
             required string name = 1;
             required string value = 2;
           }
           message Config {
             repeated Item items = 1 [experimental_map_key="name"];
           }
         In this situation, the map key for Item will be set to "name".
         TODO: Fully-implement this, then remove the "experimental_" prefix.
         
      • hasWeak

        boolean hasWeak()
        optional bool weak = 10 [default = false];
         For Google-internal migration only. Do not use.
         
      • getWeak

        boolean getWeak()
        optional bool weak = 10 [default = false];
         For Google-internal migration only. Do not use.
         
      • getUninterpretedOptionList

        java.util.List<DescriptorProtos.UninterpretedOption> getUninterpretedOptionList()
        repeated .google.protobuf.UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
         The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
         
      • getUninterpretedOption

        DescriptorProtos.UninterpretedOption getUninterpretedOption​(int index)
        repeated .google.protobuf.UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
         The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
         
      • getUninterpretedOptionCount

        int getUninterpretedOptionCount()
        repeated .google.protobuf.UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
         The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
         
      • getUninterpretedOptionOrBuilderList

        java.util.List<? extends DescriptorProtos.UninterpretedOptionOrBuilder> getUninterpretedOptionOrBuilderList()
        repeated .google.protobuf.UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
         The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
         
      • getUninterpretedOptionOrBuilder

        DescriptorProtos.UninterpretedOptionOrBuilder getUninterpretedOptionOrBuilder​(int index)
        repeated .google.protobuf.UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
         The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.